Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Letter to the editor: Lattner

Letter to the editor:
Criminalizing Minors

You won't believe where our civil liberties are being attacked now. My 13 year old son and two others like him were facing a misdemeanor charge by the Kasson-Mantorville Police School Resource Officer (SRO). The offense was for being offered and/or taking less than $.30 of "Frooties" candy from a friend's locker. The boy who owned the Frooties candy, gave his combination to other boys who opened the locker and were getting candy. My son asked what they were doing and they asked him if he wanted some candy. My son said, "yes" and took approx 20 of the small pieces which he also handed out to his friends during the day. The owner of the locker noticed the candy being gone and reported it to Officer Peck who was nearby. Officer Peck reviewed the school camera film, conducted a recorded interrogation of the minors without a parent or lawyer present, and issued criminal citations that were forwarded to the Dodge County Court.

For this offense, three of the four boys were given a three  day out-of-school suspension and were later charged with criminal misdemeanor theft. Another boy known by the officer received no citation or out-of-school suspension at all. The family of and the boy who reported the missing candy to Officer Peck asked that no charges be brought against these minor boys. Officer Peck pushed it through till it reached the Dodge County Prosecutor and Court. The Court threw the case out when the first minor appeared for this court hearing.

When I spoke with the Kasson-Mantorville Superintendent of Schools, Mark Matuska, he was not aware that the District had signed off on forwarding the charges for some candy and felt the punishment was not proportional to the alleged offense. The Dodge County Court said they would not normally take a case like this but because it was pushed through they are obligated to hear it. The children were being charged under the same statute as taking items off war dead (MN Statute 609.52). No such charges appear from Triton or Hayfield School Districts which also report to the Dodge County Court.

The Districts outside of Kasson-Mantorville refer drug and violence cases which are better suited for the legal system and its limited resources. We never had these problems under our previous SRO through the Dodge County Sherriffs Office. Our Kasson Police Department SRO primarily focuses on candy and food fights for criminal action.

The problem is that SROs are in our schools to protect against real crime: drugs, violence, and bullying. Unfortunately, some like Officer Peck are taking away the rights of active parents to raise their young children and discipline them in a way that brings them to a healthy and productive adulthood. Instead of working with the parents, he throws it into the courts.

The use of school-based citations, interrogations without a parent or attorney present, and arrests as a means of addressing even minor, non-violent disciplinary infractions should raise serious concerns for educators, parents, and the wider community.

While there is no question that guaranteeing the safety of our public schools is important, we must never come to view criminally citing minor infractions committed by minor aged school students as just another approach to discipline.

Instead, every time a school-based citation or other police punishment occurs, we must ask: Was this a rational, proportional, and evenhanded response to the misbehavior? Was it really necessary? Was there another way?

Plainly, SRO’s can help make schools safer. But with the wrong SRO, his presence also may encourage a criminal justice response to misconduct better addressed by school administrators and active parents who work with those administrators.

Unfortunately, there is a trend over the last few years of criminalizing our Kasson- Mantorville children, through increased reliance on selective zero-tolerance school discipline, school-based interrogations, and citations. This is beginning to create an atmosphere of the "school-to-probations pipeline" for our minors.

There is a lot of documentation available in the local media and the Dodge County Court to see this trend occurring here in the K-M School District. The focus is not on drugs, violence, or bullying. This SRO has put his focus on minor infractions and has escalated them to where our court is becoming the mandated parent of our children. Again, is this the most rational, proportional, and evenhanded response to minor misbehavior?

                  Respectfully Submitted,
                      Bernie Lattner


13 comments:

  1. I am a recent graduate of Kasson Mantorville High School, and I felt as though an ideal Student Resource Officer is to come in and help out a situation when necessary. That is NOT the case for KMHS. Shouldn't a situation like the one above be settled by getting the boys together and just talking, and working the problem out themselves? If we had any faith in our school system, then I'm sure we can trust a couple of students getting to a solution about a bag of "Frooties". This is an area where, when reported an issue like this, a SRO should have noticed the incident is dealing with an easily resolvable issue and also that they are in the school system which means we should want the kids to grow. Not be brought down and not be the victim of misuse of power. Something needs to be done!

    -Recent KM Graduate

    ReplyDelete
  2. is this what we taxpayers are paying $80,000 a year for? Does not seem like a good return on investment.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So happy we moved out of kasson and my children go to Byron....
    .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We may be going to Byron as well.

      Delete
    2. Sounds like we need a "changing of the guard!!"

      Delete
    3. SRO's do their job and write citations because the school and parents don't know how to properly hold children accountable for their actions. Parents think they are helping and protecting their children by holding Officer Peck responsible, when most of the time it's the school who is asking him to write tickets, so the school can say "it's out of our hands". I myself being a parent would find this a good time to teach my child that he did something wrong and to hold him accountable for his actions. Everyone blames law enforcement and schools for problems that are probaly caused in the home. But god forbid we teach our kids... accountability, respect, honesty, integrity, and most of all "Don't steal in the first place".

      Delete
    4. The children were punished both by the parents and the school (3 day suspension). We all believe in accountability and the the other character traits mentioned. The Criminal Citation was above and beyond the normal range of correcting a child and put it to the Court to add additional sentencing. Punishment needs to be proportional, this was way over the top.

      Delete
  4. Mr. Lattner's Letter to the Editor stated that Supt. Matuska said he "was unaware that the district signed-off on forwarding the charges and felt the punishment wasn't proportional to the offense". I would be interested in knowing which district official, in addition to the SRO, did sign-off on forwarding the charges. Since his son is 13, he's probably a middle school student. While I agree with most of Mr. Latter's points, Minnesota Statute 609.52 is the Theft Statute and deals with a wide variety of theft situations,not necessarily war dead. As an educator with over 30 years of experience, I recall several occasions when students "borrowed" small items such as pencils, toys, or even candy from another student. A conversation, an apology, restitution, and a call to Mom or Dad took care of it 100% of the time. The crime needs to fit the punishment.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mr Lattner's letter doesn't even make sense:
    1. first the "candy" boy gives other boy's the combo to his locker? why..was it to take candy or for some other reason?
    2. per Lattner's letter, his son never had the okay to help himself to the candy but yet he takes it and hands it out to other friends
    3. the "candy" boy reports the candy missing? (why would he do that if he gave the boys the okay to take the candy?)

    I never see anything close to an apology? did Lattner's boy apologize for taking something that wasn't his...oh yeah, isn't taking something that doesn't belong to you stealing?? I'm pretty sure that's close to the definition of stealing.

    Maybe Lattner needs to teach his kids to not take things that don't belong to them even if others are doing it?

    Granted I'm not sure why the school felt the need to take it further, but per the KTTC news cast, the comment was made that it was done because there had been past problems.

    Perhaps Lattner's son isn't the angel he'd like everyone to think he is? Maybe he needs to simmer down and let this go.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He was punished with extra chores, purchasing a new bag of "Frooties" to repay his friend, and a lecture about better choices and decision making. He also received a 3 day out of school suspension. Then a week later we received the criminal citation. We just do not believe the criminal citation was warrented or proportional given everything else that was done to address the problem. This is what is happening that criminalizes our kids. And it is selective criminalization - friends of the officer get off scott free from stealing, bringing knives into the school, etc, while other kids face the full force of the law for doing stupid kid stuff: pushing-and-shoving in line becomes assault and terroristic threats, food fight puts 35 kids into the court for rioting and destroying public property, licking ice cream in a way that may be interpreted as sexual became a sexual harrassment charge. These are all facts in the K-M District with this SRO.

      Delete
    2. Are these facts or rumors? If they are facts can you please tell me where I can verify them? How does one get this information since juvenile cases are supposed to be confidential?

      Delete
  6. I agree with what you are saying, but we don't know these kids past history. All they can report on is the one incident. What if the victim gets picked on a lot by these kids on a daily basis or by other kids. What if this kid who had things taken from him would have hurt himself or others? Then you would say the Officer did nothing. Thank you to all the police officers who works in our schools waiting for the unthinkable to happen. You forget, this is the same officer that would give his life for any of your children or staff. Thank you Officer Peck for what you would do for your community if needed.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If the tables were turned and no citation issued the complaint would be the SRO is not doing his job. In every case that law enforcement deals with there are always two opposite sides. No matter what the Officer decides one party will be upset and frustrated. I commend Officer Peck for doing what he thought was right as all Police Officers should.

    ReplyDelete

You are highly encouraged to share your opinions and thoughts. Comments are moderated, and will not be posted until reviewed, anything that may be inappropriate for all ages will not be posted.

PLEASE INCLUDE YOUR NAME WITH THE COMMENT OTHERWISE IT MAY NOT BE PUBLISHED.